Bethlehem Steel



Home

About

Bethlehem Lukens Plate Products

Credit

Customers

Employees

Environment

Facilities

Image Bank

Investor Relations/
Financial


Joint Ventures

Links

News Room

Products

Purchasing

Research

Site Map

What's New

 

Request for Preliminary Bridge Girder Comparisons

Preliminary Bridge Girder Comparisons (continued)

Results of the Analysis:

All information generated from the computer program is summarized and placed in a report for presentation to the engineer. Relative cost indices are included for all schemes (Figure 2).

FIG. 2

Cost and Weight Index Summary

Scheme Design Method Spans Material Stiff. Web Girder Spacing No. of Girders Wt. Each Girder (lbs) WT. all Girders (tons) WT. Index Cost Index
A LFD 3@127' A572 T 63 X V 12.00' 7 97080 340 1.35 1.21
B LFD [email protected]' A572 T 60 X V 12.00' 7 71816 251 1.00 1.00
C WSD [email protected]' A572 T 60 x V 12.00' 7 75754 265 1.05 1.03
D LFD [email protected]' A36 T 63 x V 12.00' 7 85757 300 1.19 1.05
E LFD [email protected]' A572 T 42 x V 10.50' 8 72713 291 1.16 1.11

From this information, designers can make economic comparisons between their numerous options. Some typical comparisons include the following:

  • Unpainted A588 versus painted A572
  • Load Factor Design versus Allowable Stress Design
  • Number of girders in cross-section
  • Span arrangement
  • Effects of depth restrictions

The optimum scheme is shown with complete detail and material listings (Figure 3).


Bridges Bridges Technical Bulletins


  If you have any questions or comments, please Contact Us
�2000, Bethlehem Steel Corporation