Legal Proceedings

Investor Relations

10-K, 1994

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commission file number 1-1941
BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         DELAWARE                                  24-0526133
   (State of incorporation)              (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
      1170 Eighth Avenue             	           18016-7699
    BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA                         (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (610) 694-2424 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

    
    Title of each class                 Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock $1 per value per share            New York Stock Exchange
                                               Chicago Stock Exchange
Preference Stock Purchase Rights               New York Stock Exchange
                                               Chicago Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock-$1 per value per share
     $5.00 Cumulative Convertible              New York Stock Exchange
     (stated value $50.00 per share)
     $2.50 Cumulative Convertible              New York Stock Exchange
     (stated value $25.00 per share)
6 7/8% Debentures. Due March 1, 1999           New York Stock Exchange
9% Debentures. Due May 15, 2000                New York Stock Exchange
8 3/8% Debentures. Due March 1, 2001           New York Stock Exchange
8.45% Debentures. Due March 1, 2005            New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (of for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                                               Yes X   No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Aggregate Market Value of Voting Stock held by Non-Affiliates: $1,717,158,980.25

The amount shown is based on the closing price of Bethlehem Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on March 15, 1995. Voting stock held by directors and executive officers of Bethlehem is not included in the computation. However, Bethlehem has made no determination that such individuals are "affiliates" within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933.

Number of Shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 15, 1995: 110,056,163

Documents incorporated by reference:

Selected portions of the 1994 Annual Report to Stockholders of Bethlehem Steel Corporation are incorporated by reference into Part II of this Report on Form 10-K.

Selected portions of the 1995 Proxy Statement of Bethlehem Steel Corporation are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report on Form 10-K.

Legal Proceedings. Item 3

Bethlehem is a party to numerous legal proceedings incurred in the ordinary course of its business, including the matters specifically discussed below.

On October 4, 1990, the State of Maryland Department of the Environment (the "MDE") filed a civil action against Bethlehem in the Circuit Court of Baltimore County, Maryland seeking civil penalties for alleged violations of the Maryland air pollution regulations arising out of exceedances of the visible emissions standards established for various sources at the Sparrows Point Division by an October 1987 Consent Order, as amended in June 1989. On April 30, 1991, the MDE filed a complaint in intervention in a civil action filed on April 25, 1991 by the Justice Department on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") against Bethlehem, alleging violations of the Clean Air Act resulting from alleged violations of Maryland air pollution regulations at the Sparrows Point Division. The complaint in intervention, which was approved by the Court on June 14, 1991, incorporated all of the violations alleged in the MDE complaint. On May 1, 1992, a settlement between the parties to the EPA action was memorialized in a Consent Decree, which was entered by the Court on July 1, 1992. The Consent Decree resolved all of the issues in both the federal and state actions except for a single count in the MDE action dealing with alleged violations from the basic oxygen furnace. Bethlehem and the MDE have entered into discussions concerning potential settlement of the remaining count in the MDE action.

On October 16, 1990, the Justice Department on behalf of the EPA filed a civil action against Bethlehem in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana seeking injunctive relief and civil penalties for alleged violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended ("RCRA") and the Safe Drinking Water Act with respect to the Burns Harbor Division, including failure to manage certain of the operation's sludges as hazardous wastes, and failure to begin a corrective action program pursuant to the terms of a previously issued underground injection permit. On March 19, 1993, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Partial Summary Judgment for the government concerning the liability issues in the case and ordering Bethlehem to comply with interim status requirements of RCRA for its terminal polishing lagoons and landfill and to comply with the corrective action requirements of Bethlehem's underground injection well permits. A hearing on the civil penalty issue was concluded on July 21, 1993, and on August 31, 1993, the Court entered a judgment against Bethlehem for $6 million. This sum consisted of $4.2 million for alleged permit violations and $1.8 million for the alleged landfill violations. Bethlehem filed separate Notices of Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit appealing the trial court's grant of summary judgment and its penalty determination. On September 26, 1994, the Seventh Circuit issued a decision reversing the trial court's summary judgment with respect to the alleged violations concerning the terminal polishing lagoons and landfill, holding that the sludges are not subject to regulation as hazardous waste under RCRA. The decision affirmed the summary judgment with respect to the alleged permit violations. Bethlehem's appeal of the $4.2 million civil penalty amount for the alleged permit violations remains pending before the Seventh Circuit.

On May 28, 1992, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("DEC") sent Bethlehem a proposed Order on Consent to resolve various alleged violations of the New York air pollution control regulations for emissions from the Lackawanna coke ovens. The Order, which originally covered alleged violations for the period from May 1, 1990 through October 7, 1991, has been supplemented to cover all alleged violations of state air pollution regulations up to the date of execution of the proposed Order and to cite Bethlehem for failure to properly operate its sulfur recovery system in the coal chemical by products plant and failure to properly certify opacity monitors on the under fire stacks of the coke oven batteries. In addition, the currently proposed Order includes a civil penalty of $1.1 million. Bethlehem has entered into negotiations with the DEC to attempt to resolve this matter. If those negotiations are unsuccessful, Bethlehem believes it has meritorious defenses and will vigorously defend the action.

BethEnergy Mines Inc. (formerly Bethlehem Minerals Company), a subsidiary of Bethlehem, is a party to an action entitled Church and Mullins, et al v. Bethlehem Minerals Company, et al. The case involves a dispute concerning title to coal mined by Bethlehem under a parcel of land in eastern Kentucky. The trial court opinion, delivered February 25, 1987, held that the coal in question was owned by the Church and Mullins interests and awarded damages in the amount of $16.9 million. On appeal, on January 12, 1990, the Kentucky Court of Appeals reversed the trial court judgment in part and affirmed it in part, essentially upholding the trial court's finding on the issue of title but limiting the award of damages. The Court of Appeals decision was further appealed to the Supreme Court of Kentucky, and on June 4, 1992, the Supreme Court of Kentucky, by a vote of four to three, reinstated the decision of the trial court. On June 24, 1992, Bethlehem petitioned the Kentucky Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling.

On December�23, 1994, the Court denied the Motion, upholding the original verdict, plus interest. Bethlehem has paid $37.6 million, representing the full amount of the judgment, including interest, into the trial court and intends to seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court. An adverse final resolution of the case will not have any other effect on Bethlehem's results of operations because Bethlehem sold its Kentucky coal operations in 1988.

The Justice Department, the EPA and the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (formerly Texas Water Commission) have instituted a criminal investigation into certain environmental practices involving the operations of the BethShip Sabine Yard in Port Arthur, Texas. The basic operations of the Yard comprise the dry-docking of marine vessels to clean and paint exterior surfaces and internal tanks, as well as performing steel hull plate repairs and other general repairs. These operations use blasting grit, paint thinner and other materials. The investigation includes the above operations and the usage, treatment, storage and disposal of those materials. Bethlehem has cooperated with the authorities as to the conduct of the investigation. The Department of Justice has indicated that it intends to institute a criminal action against BethShip Sabine Yard, and Bethlehem is engaged in discussions seeking a resolution of the issues involved.

On January 13, 1993, the EPA issued an Administrative Complaint alleging that Bethlehem had failed to report certain spills of hazardous substances from various locations at the Burns Harbor Division as required by Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"). The EPA proposed a civil penalty of $207,750. Bethlehem and the EPA entered into discussions concerning potential settlement of the action. Following meetings in which Bethlehem demonstrated to the EPA that none of the spills involved reportable quantities, the EPA filed motions with the Administrative Law Judge to withdraw all counts of the complaint. On December 14, 1994, the Administrative Law Judge dismissed the complaint.

On June 9, 1994, the EPA issued an administrative Complaint and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing alleging several violations of the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) regulations under the Toxic Substance Control Act by Bethlehem at the Sparrows Point Division. The Complaint sets forth a proposed civil penalty of $145,500. On June 30, 1994, Bethlehem filed its Answer and Request for Hearing. Settlement discussions have been initiated between Bethlehem and the EPA. If such discussions do not succeed, Bethlehem believes it has meritorious defenses and will vigorously defend the action.

See "Business. Item 1. General Environmental Control and Cleanup Expenditures" of this Report for a discussion of Bethlehem's potential responsibilities for environmental cleanup at certain sites under RCRA and CERCLA.

Bethlehem cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of any legal proceedings to which it is a party. However, in the opinion of Bethlehem's management, adequate reserves have been recorded for losses which are likely to result from these proceedings. To the extent that such reserves prove to be inadequate, Bethlehem would incur a charge to earnings which could be material to its future results of operations in particular quarterly or annual periods. The outcome of these proceedings, however, is not currently expected to have a material adverse effect on Bethlehem's consolidated financial position.

Red Bar
Main Menu
Investor Relations Commercial Information
Environment History Vision Statement Public Affairs Research